m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026

Healthcare personnel masking: current practices and gaps in standardized thresholds.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Gibas Kevin M, Head Thomas, Broadley Marissa, Mermel Leonard A

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: To characterize institutional masking policies for healthcare personnel (HCP) and identify factors informing masking decisions in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional, survey-based study.

SETTING: Healthcare institutions participating in the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) Research Networks.

PARTICIPANTS: One representative per institution, including infection preventionists, hospital epidemiologists, or healthcare administrators, knowledgeable about organizational masking policies.

METHODS: A structured, web-based survey was distributed through the SHEA/APIC Research Networks. Survey domains included institutional characteristics, masking strategies outside of transmission-based precautions, epidemiologic and operational factors influencing masking decisions, and mask types required. Responses were collected anonymously via REDCap over a six-week period and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS: A total of 172 unique healthcare institutions completed the survey (41% response rate, n = 172/425). Most respondents were infection preventionists (65%) or hospital epidemiologists (25%). The most common masking approach was a seasonal or situational risk-based strategy (57%), while 7% of institutions reported no formal masking policy. Among institutions using seasonal or situational masking, decisions were most frequently informed by outbreaks or clusters (37%), public health guidance (33%), and HCP illness/absenteeism (27%). Most institutions reported no fixed epidemiologic thresholds for masking decisions. When masking was required, surgical masks were most commonly used (98%).

CONCLUSIONS: Masking policies and decision-making criteria vary widely across healthcare institutions, reflecting a lack of standardized operational guidance. These findings underscore the need for consensus-based, data-driven frameworks to support consistent, transparent, and evidence-informed masking policies in healthcare settings.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты