Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2002
Galvanic-evoked myogenic responses in patients with an absence of click-evoked vestibulo-collic reflexes.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murofushi Toshihisa, Takegoshi Hideki, Ohki Masafumi, Ozeki Hidenori
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To show that galvanic-evoked responses on the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) are useful for differentiating labyrinthine lesions from retro-labyrinthine lesions in patients with an absence of click-evoked vestibulo-collic reflexes.
METHODS: We studied the average responses in the unrectified electromyographic (EMG) activities of the SCM to galvanic stimulation (3mA, 1ms). The cathodal electrode was on the mastoid, and the anodal electrode was on the forehead. Twenty-two healthy subjects and 28 patients with vestibular disorders were studied. All of the 28 patients showed the unilateral absence of vestibulo-collic reflexes evoked by 95dBnHL clicks on the affected side.
RESULTS: In healthy subjects mastoid-forehead galvanic stimulation produced a positive-negative biphasic EMG response at short latency on the SCM ipsilateral to the cathodal electrode. All patients with labyrinthine lesions showed biphasic EMG responses even in the affected side. In contrast, almost all patients with retro-labyrinthine lesions (16/18) showed no response or a decreased response on the affected side.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that galvanic-evoked myogenic responses on the SCM may be useful in the differential diagnosis of labyrinthine lesions from retro-labyrinthine lesions in patients with an absence of vestibulo-collic reflexes evoked by clicks.
METHODS: We studied the average responses in the unrectified electromyographic (EMG) activities of the SCM to galvanic stimulation (3mA, 1ms). The cathodal electrode was on the mastoid, and the anodal electrode was on the forehead. Twenty-two healthy subjects and 28 patients with vestibular disorders were studied. All of the 28 patients showed the unilateral absence of vestibulo-collic reflexes evoked by 95dBnHL clicks on the affected side.
RESULTS: In healthy subjects mastoid-forehead galvanic stimulation produced a positive-negative biphasic EMG response at short latency on the SCM ipsilateral to the cathodal electrode. All patients with labyrinthine lesions showed biphasic EMG responses even in the affected side. In contrast, almost all patients with retro-labyrinthine lesions (16/18) showed no response or a decreased response on the affected side.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that galvanic-evoked myogenic responses on the SCM may be useful in the differential diagnosis of labyrinthine lesions from retro-labyrinthine lesions in patients with an absence of vestibulo-collic reflexes evoked by clicks.