DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.009
Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Mitral and Aortic Valve Calcium in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.
Аннотация
Calcium in the cardiac valves can be observed in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the prevalence and prognostic implications of left-sided cardiac valve calcium in patients with stage 2 and 3 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 to 89 and 30 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m² respectively) is unknown. The present study investigates the prevalence of mitral and aortic valve calcium in patients with stage 2 and 3 CKD and evaluates its association with all-cause mortality. In patients with stage 2 and 3 CKD who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography, the presence of mitral and/or aortic valve calcium was assessed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of mitral and/or aortic valve calcium on coronary computed tomography angiography. Patients were followed for the occurrence of all-cause mortality (primary end point). Of 204 stage 2 and 3 CKD patients (54% men, mean age 60 ± 10 years), 66 (32%) patients had mitral and/or aortic valve calcium. During a median follow-up of 6 years (IQR; 2, 9 years), 29 (14%) patients died. Patients with mitral and/or aortic valve calcium showed significantly higher mortality rates compared with patients without left-sided valve calcium (log-rank p = 0.009). Mitral valve calcium was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, whereas aortic valve calcium was not. In conclusion, the prevalence of left-sided valve calcium in patients with stage 2 and 3 CKD is high. Mitral valve calcium was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, whereas aortic valve calcium was not.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.