MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/000348940511400209

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2005

Traction of lateral cricoarytenoid muscle for unilateral vocal fold paralysis: comparison with Isshiki' s original technique of arytenoid adduction.

Sonoda Satoshi, Kataoka Hideyuki, Inoue Takayo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Between 1995 and 1997, we performed Isshiki's original method of arytenoid adduction alone or as an adjunct to type I thyroplasty for the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis. From 1997 onward, we performed arytenoid adduction by traction of the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle (Iwamura's method), because it reduces discomfort to the patient and avoids rotation of the thyroid cartilage. Preliminary experiments and surgical procedures involving traction of the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle are described. Of 21 patients with a maximum phonation time of less than 9 seconds, 14 underwent type I thyroplasty as an adjunct to our method of arytenoid adduction and 7 underwent arytenoid adduction alone. Sixteen patients (76%) were able after surgery to extend their maximum phonation time beyond 10 seconds; this result compares favorably with the results of Isshiki's original adduction technique. We describe useful anatomic landmarks for approaching the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle in the hope that more voice surgeons will adopt this approach in the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis.

Для цитирования: Sonoda Satoshi, Kataoka Hideyuki, Inoue Takayo. Traction of lateral cricoarytenoid muscle for unilateral vocal fold paralysis: comparison with Isshiki' s original technique of arytenoid adduction.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/000348940511400209.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.