MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ta.0000000000004927

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and damage-control laparotomy in acute care surgery patients: A safe and successful option for patient rescue.

Ghneim Mira H, Deshwar Amar B, Zhang Ashling L, O'meara Lindsay, Vesselinov Roumen, Efron David T, Stein Deborah M, Powell Elizabeth, Rabin Joseph, Scalea Thomas M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The combined use of Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and damage-control laparotomy/open abdomen (DCL/OA) is not well described in the literature. We hypothesized that the mortality with concurrent VV-ECMO and DCL/OA would not be statistically different from that reported for either intervention alone.

METHODS

Patients managed with a DCL/OA and VV-ECMO from March 2014 through March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database at a single quaternary care center. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Survivor and nonsurvivor cohorts were compared using univariate and bivariate analyses with a priori significance at p  ≤ 0.05. A multivariable regression analyses was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were managed with VV-ECMO and concurrent DCL/OA. The majority of patients were male (58%), with a mean (SD) age of 41 (14) years. The primary indication for VV-ECMO was acute respiratory distress syndrome/pneumonia (83%). The primary indications for DCL/OA were abdominal compartment syndrome (37%) and trauma (19%). Sixty percent of the patients underwent VV-ECMO cannulation after DCL/OA. Survival at hospital discharge was 58%. Survivors had a lower mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (12 vs. 14, p  = 0.02), higher mean Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction score (3.5 vs. 1.1, p  = 0.004), lower mean preoperative lactic acid level (4 vs. 7, p  = 0.04) and were more likely to receive anticoagulation while on VV-ECMO (70% vs. 30%, p  = 0.012) than nonsurvivors. Postdischarge, survival rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 90%, 72%, 69%, and 62%, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, the use of anticoagulation (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.42) and a higher Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction score (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.95) were associated with decreased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Relatively favorable outcomes are often achieved in acute care surgery patients treated with concomitant VV-ECMO and DCL/OA. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should not be considered a contraindication to DCL/OA and vice versa. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;101: 136-144. Copyright © 2026 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study; Level III.

Для цитирования: Ghneim Mira H, Deshwar Amar B, Zhang Ashling L, O'meara Lindsay, Vesselinov Roumen, Efron David T, Stein Deborah M, Powell Elizabeth, Rabin Joseph, Scalea Thomas M. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and damage-control laparotomy in acute care surgery patients: A safe and successful option for patient rescue.. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004927.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.