Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
Stereoacuity after small aperture corneal inlay implantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Linn Steven H, Skanchy David F, Quist Tyler S, Desautels Jordan D, Moshirfar Majid
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare stereoacuity before and after KAMRA corneal inlay implantation for the correction of presbyopia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 60 patients who underwent KAMRA inlay implantation. Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery for stereoacuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA).
RESULTS: The mean stereoacuity before surgery was 29.5±28.1 arcsec (range: 20-200) and at 6 months was 29.8±26.4 arcsec (range: 20-200). The decline in stereoacuity was not statistically significant. At 6 months follow-up, UDVA was 20/25 or better in all 60 patients and UNVA was J2 (20/25) or better in 51 (85%) patients.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant change in stereoacuity following KAMRA inlay implantation. The KAMRA inlay is a good treatment option for improving near vision in presbyopic patients while preserving stereoacuity and distance vision.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 60 patients who underwent KAMRA inlay implantation. Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery for stereoacuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA).
RESULTS: The mean stereoacuity before surgery was 29.5±28.1 arcsec (range: 20-200) and at 6 months was 29.8±26.4 arcsec (range: 20-200). The decline in stereoacuity was not statistically significant. At 6 months follow-up, UDVA was 20/25 or better in all 60 patients and UNVA was J2 (20/25) or better in 51 (85%) patients.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant change in stereoacuity following KAMRA inlay implantation. The KAMRA inlay is a good treatment option for improving near vision in presbyopic patients while preserving stereoacuity and distance vision.