MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1044/2015_aja-14-0080

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of audiology · 2015

Clinician-Supported Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatment of Tinnitus.

Andersson Gerhard

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Internet-delivered psychological treatments for tinnitus distress have existed for more than 15 years, and there are a slowly growing number of studies. The aim of this brief report is to review the evidence and to comment on the future potentials of Internet treatments for tinnitus.

METHOD: Studies were retrieved, and in total 6 controlled studies were included in the review with 9 different comparisons (6 in which the treatment was compared against a control group and 3 in which Internet treatment was compared against group treatment). Moreover, 2 open studies based on clinical samples in regular care were also included in the review. The outcomes for the 2 controlled sets of studies were analyzed using meta-analytic methods.

RESULTS

For the 6 studies comparing Internet treatment against a no-treatment control condition, a moderate effect size was found (Hedges's g = 0.58). The 3 studies comparing Internet treatment against face-to-face group treatments showed a small difference of Hedges's g =0.13.

CONCLUSIONS

Internet-delivered psychological treatment holds promise as a treatment alternative to other standard forms of treatment delivery, including group treatment. Larger studies are needed as well as ways to blend information technology with regular services.

Для цитирования: Andersson Gerhard. Clinician-Supported Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatment of Tinnitus.. American journal of audiology. 2015. DOI: 10.1044/2015_aja-14-0080.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.