DOI 10.1097/00129492-200111000-00034
Internal auditory canal involvement of acoustic neuromas: surgical correlates to magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Factors that play a role in the selection of surgical approach for acoustic neuromas include patient health and age, size of tumor, hearing status, and location of tumor in the internal auditory canal (IAC) and the cerebellopontine angle. Deep extension into the IAC makes hearing preservation extremely difficult when a retrosigmoid craniotomy is used, and the best approach is a middle fossa subtemporal route. Modern gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be inaccurate in identifying the presence of tumor laterally in the IAC. This may affect the selection of a surgical approach.
STUDY
DESIGN
This study was a retrospective case review.
SETTING
Patients were accrued from a tertiary referral otologic practice.
PATIENTS: From 1997 through 2000, the authors identified six patients who had undergone acoustic neuroma surgery, had adequate imaging and intraoperative data, and demonstrated a lack of correlation between MRI and intraoperative findings of the lateral IAC.
INTERVENTION: The interventions were preoperative MRI of the IAC and surgical resection of an acoustic neuroma.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Comparison of MRI and intraoperative findings of the lateral IAC were the main outcome measures.
RESULTS
Six patients demonstrated a lack of correlation between MRI and intraoperative findings of the lateral IAC.
CONCLUSIONS
Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI findings of the depth of penetration into the lateral aspect of the IAC do not always correlate with intraoperative findings and thus may have implications in the selection of surgical approaches to acoustic neuromas.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.