DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108469
The impact of Candida infection on short-term and long-term outcomes in AECOPD patients: A 3-year multicenter cohort study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The clinical significance of Candida infection in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) remains poorly defined.
METHODS
This multicenter cohort study analyzed 11,925 hospitalized AECOPD patients from ten centers in China, grouped by Candida infection status. Subgroups were analyzed by Candida species and invasiveness. Primary outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Propensity score matching and Cox regression were used to adjust for confounders.
RESULTS
Candida-positive AECOPD patients showed significantly worse short-term outcomes, including increased IMV (7.2% vs 3.8%) and NIV use (31.8% vs 18.2%), more ICU admissions (12.7% vs 8.9%), and prolonged hospitalization (15.97 vs 11.16 days, P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in 30-day mortality between groups (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.63-2.03), but 3-year mortality was significantly higher (41.2% vs 30.5%, P < 0.001) in Candida positive group. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences by species or invasiveness.
CONCLUSION
Respiratory Candida infection is associated with worse short-term clinical outcomes and increased 3-year mortality in AECOPD patients, but is not an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. Neither species nor invasiveness classification offered prognostic value. Screening may identify high-risk patients, but evidence does not support species-specific or β-d-glucan (BDG)-guided therapy among this population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.