MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s44470-026-00046-2

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026

What's leak got to do with it? Association of mask leak and positive airway pressure adherence from the homepap study.

Andrews Noah D, El Ahdab Jad, Pascoe Maeve, Wang Lu, Bena James, Auckley Dennis, Benca Ruth, Billings Martha E, Kapur Vishesh, Zee Phyllis C, Redline Susan, Foldvary-Schaefer Nancy

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), yet adherence remains suboptimal. Mask leak is a common barrier, but current leak metrics don’t distinguish intentional from unintentional leak. We evaluated a novel “Real Leak” measure and compared its relationship to adherence with conventional leak metrics.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the HomePAP trial, which randomized adults at high risk for OSA to home sleep apnea testing or in-laboratory polysomnography, followed by PAP initiation. Real Leak was calculated by subtracting mask-specific intentional leak from device-reported Average Leak, essentially representing unintentional leak over 1 month. PAP adherence was defined as ≥ 4 h/night on ≥ 70% of nights at 1 and 3 months. Pearson correlations and multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex, BMI, race, education, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and apnea-hypopnea index.

RESULTS

Data were available for 139 and 124 participants at 1 and 3 months, respectively. At 3 months, adherence was 46.2%. Real Leak and Average Leak were highly correlated and inversely associated with adherence (rho[95%CI]: 1-month 0.73 [0.61,0.81], 3-month 0.90 [0.85,0.93], p < 0.001) at both timepoints. Each 1 L/min increase in Real Leak corresponded to a 0.72% decrease in adherence days, compared to 0.55% in Average Leak (p = 0.008/0.018) (7.2% and 5.5% per 10 L/min of change, respectively, p = 0.008/0.018). Race and AHI (p = 0.02/p < 0.001, respectively) were independent adherence predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Real Leak and Average Leak negatively predicted PAP adherence, with no significant performance difference. Nonetheless, standardizing leak terminology and incorporating intentional leak adjustments may improve clarity and decision-making. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE/STUDY RATIONALE: Mask leak is a common barrier to Positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence, but existing leak metrics don’t distinguish intentional from unintentional leak, limiting their clinical utility. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine emphasizes minimizing leak during PAP titration but doesn’t provide clear guidance on which leak metric to prioritize. We proposed a novel “Real Leak” measure as a potentially more clinically meaningful indicator of leak-related adherence barriers. STUDY IMPACT: In the HomePAP trial, Real Leak and Average Leak were highly correlated and similarly predicted reduced adherence, with no significant performance difference. We propose standardizing leak definitions for clinical practice and research and suggest that Real Leak - essentially unintentional leak over 1 month - is a conceptually clearer and more meaningful metric.

Для цитирования: Andrews Noah D, El Ahdab Jad, Pascoe Maeve, Wang Lu, Bena James, Auckley Dennis, Benca Ruth, Billings Martha E, Kapur Vishesh, Zee Phyllis C, Redline Susan, Foldvary-Schaefer Nancy. What's leak got to do with it? Association of mask leak and positive airway pressure adherence from the homepap study.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s44470-026-00046-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.