MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215100145293

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 1999

Outcome of using magnetic resonance imaging as an initial screen to exclude vestibular schwannoma in patients presenting with unilateral tinnitus.

Dawes P J, Basiouny H E

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The improved cost-effectiveness of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRIg) as a diagnostic tool for vestibular schwannoma has resulted in smaller tumours being diagnosed. There has been a change in the clinical presentation of these tumours and up to four per cent may present with unilateral tinnitus. The limitation of auditory brain stem response (ABR) as a screening tool that detects small tumours is recognized and there is a strong argument for using MRIg as the initial investigation. Various screening guidelines have been proposed, some include submitting patients with unilateral tinnitus for MRIg. This report describes the findings in a group of 174 patients presenting with unilateral tinnitus who underwent MRIg as part of a guideline-directed screen to exclude vestibular schwannoma. Five patients had a cause for their tinnitus diagnosed, one a vestibular schwannoma. Two had intracranial aneurysms and another three had pathology revealed that merited onward referral. A further nine patients had incidental findings that neither accounted for their symptoms nor needed further investigation or referral. The rationale for screening these patients with MRIg is discussed.

Для цитирования: Dawes P J, Basiouny H E. Outcome of using magnetic resonance imaging as an initial screen to exclude vestibular schwannoma in patients presenting with unilateral tinnitus.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 1999. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100145293.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.