MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00595-011-4515-1

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery today · 2011

Which is the best technique for pancreaticoenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A critical analysis.

Fernández-Cruz Laureano, Belli Andrea, Acosta Mario, Chavarria Enrique Jiménez, Adelsdorfer Waldemar, López-Boado Miguel Angel, Ferrer Joana

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The definitive surgical management of periampullary tumors is a challenging endeavor. This article reviews the available data on the efficacy of various methods of pancreaticoenteric reconstruction designed for the prevention of pancreatic fistula (PF). A literature search of the Medline database was used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) with pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A total of two metaanalyses and four prospective RCTs were identified. Individual RCTs comparing PJ and PG allow the surgeons participating in the trial to choose technical modifications of one particular technique. As a result, there is no universal agreement as to whether one particular variation is safer and less prone to PF than the others. In addition, the majority of RCTs failed to stratify patient risk of PF. Further studies are therefore necessary to define the optimal technique of pancreatic reconstruction after PD conducted in high-volume centers by high-volume surgeons.

Для цитирования: Fernández-Cruz Laureano, Belli Andrea, Acosta Mario, Chavarria Enrique Jiménez, Adelsdorfer Waldemar, López-Boado Miguel Angel, Ferrer Joana. Which is the best technique for pancreaticoenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A critical analysis.. Surgery today. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-011-4515-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.