MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neucir.2016.06.005

Медицинская библиотека · Neurocirugia (Asturias, Spain) · 2016

[Endoscopic treatment of 140 pituitary tumors, results and complications].

Beltrame Sofia, Toscano Maximiliano, Goldschmidt Ezequiel, Garategui Lucas, Campero Alvaro, Yampolsky Claudio, Carrizo Antonio, Ajler Pablo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 140 patients with pituitary adenomas treated by an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) over a period of 4 years.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed between 2011 and 2014. Pre and post operative MRI, ophtalmological assessment, endocrinological laboratory evaluation and surgical morbidity and mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

57,9% of the patients had functional tumors (n=81), acromegaly being the most frequent sub-type (29.3%). 78.6% of the lesions were macroadenomas (n=110) of which 56.4% (n=62) involved the cavernous sinus, 61 patients presented with visual field defects (44%) of which 50.8% of patients showed improvement after surgery. Gross total removal was achieved in 60% of the cases. Hormonal remission was achieved in the 75% of the patients with functional tumors. The morbidity rate was 15% and one patient died after surgery (mortality 0.7%).

CONCLUSION

EEA is a safe and effective tool to treat pituitary adenomas. The main limitation for complete surgical resection is the cavernous sinus invasion.

Для цитирования: Beltrame Sofia, Toscano Maximiliano, Goldschmidt Ezequiel, Garategui Lucas, Campero Alvaro, Yampolsky Claudio, Carrizo Antonio, Ajler Pablo. [Endoscopic treatment of 140 pituitary tumors, results and complications].. Neurocirugia (Asturias, Spain). 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucir.2016.06.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.