Duration and dose of chemotherapy and dental development.

BACKGROUND

Given the susceptibility of developing tissues to drugs, even small doses of anticancer drugs may affect odontogenesis. Although any toxic effect is transient, the treatment regimens are based on repeated drug administration.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to establish the impact of antineoplastic therapy on the occurrence of longterm adverse dental effects in a dose-dependent manner in young survivors treated for cancer before 10 years of age.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

In total, 37 cancer survivors treated with antineoplastic therapy before 10 years of age underwent a dental examination with a thorough analysis of panoramic radiographs. A total of 236 teeth with 243 different developmental abnormalities were revealed in 28 survivors. Agenesis, tooth size reduction, taurodontia, and enamel and root abnormalities were diagnosed. All survivors received multi-agent chemotherapy, with the most frequently used drugs being vincristine (VCR), doxorubicin (DXR), cyclophosphamide (CP), ifosfamide (IF), etoposide (VP-16), carboplatin (CBDCA), cisplatin (CDDP), and actinomycin-D (ActD). A detailed analysis of medical records was also performed to assess the relationship between the treatment duration as well as the cumulative drug dose administered and the occurrence of particular disturbances.

RESULTS

When analyzing the treatment duration and the drug doses in the affected and non-affected participants, there were no statistically significant differences between the survivors with different disturbances within most of the specific drug groups. In some groups, the mean cumulative treatment dose was significantly higher in the non-affected patients. According to Spearman's rho, no significant relationships were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, no significant differences in terms of treatment duration or drug doses were observed between the patients with particular abnormalities. The developmental stage of tooth formation during chemotherapy is likely the most important factor influencing dental changes. For future research with respect to different treatment protocols, an analysis of a more homogenous group of survivors is warranted.