Frontiers in medicine · 2025
Comparison of single-spin to double-spin platelet-rich plasma centrifugation methods in the treatment of androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghanem Laura, Kirmani Najwaa, Palacios-Ortiz María Paula, Cevallos-Cueva Martin, Mendoza-Millán Daniela Lucía, Almeida Nascimento Gabriel Victor, Velasco-Tamariz Virginia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common hair loss disease, caused by a combination of genetic factors and hormonal imbalances. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has gained significant recognition in treating AGA, but optimal treatment protocol regarding centrifugation techniques has yet to reach a standardized consensus. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of single-spin versus double-spin centrifugation protocols for PRP in patients with AGA.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for RCTs comparing single-spin to double-spin PRP in AGA patients. The primary endpoint was the final platelets count after centrifugation. Secondary endpoints included improvement in hair density, as well as terminal and vellus hair rate. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio software. Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics.
RESULTS: We included 90 participants with AGA from three RCTs. The pooled mean difference (MD) for platelets concentration was 66.14 in single-spin compared to double-spin PRP (95% CI: -372.96 to 505.25; p = 0.77; I 2 = 83.5%). The MD for change in hair density was 4.10% in single versus double-spin (95% CI: -4.74 to 12.93; p = 0.36; I 2 = 0%). Moreover, the MD for terminal and vellus hair after single-spin versus double-spin PRP was 1.16 (95% CI: -3.34 to 5.66; p = 0.61; I 2 = 0%), and -3.59 (95% CI: -12.49 to 5.30; p = 0.45; I 2 = 4.8%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that single-spin PRP centrifugation is better in treating AGA patients compared to double-spin PRP.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025643296, identifier CRD42025643296.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for RCTs comparing single-spin to double-spin PRP in AGA patients. The primary endpoint was the final platelets count after centrifugation. Secondary endpoints included improvement in hair density, as well as terminal and vellus hair rate. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio software. Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 statistics.
RESULTS: We included 90 participants with AGA from three RCTs. The pooled mean difference (MD) for platelets concentration was 66.14 in single-spin compared to double-spin PRP (95% CI: -372.96 to 505.25; p = 0.77; I 2 = 83.5%). The MD for change in hair density was 4.10% in single versus double-spin (95% CI: -4.74 to 12.93; p = 0.36; I 2 = 0%). Moreover, the MD for terminal and vellus hair after single-spin versus double-spin PRP was 1.16 (95% CI: -3.34 to 5.66; p = 0.61; I 2 = 0%), and -3.59 (95% CI: -12.49 to 5.30; p = 0.45; I 2 = 4.8%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that single-spin PRP centrifugation is better in treating AGA patients compared to double-spin PRP.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025643296, identifier CRD42025643296.