MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12348-011-0043-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2011

Nocardia scleritis-clinical presentation and management: a report of three cases and review of literature.

Sahu Srikant Kumar, Sharma Savitri, Das Sujata

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: This study aims to describe the clinical features and management of Nocardia scleritis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed medical charts of three patients with microbiologically proven Nocardia scleritis and reviewed literature.

RESULTS

All the patients presented with areas of well-demarcated, circumscribed abscess. No specific clinical feature could be attributed to the causative organism. Nocardia was identified by smear and culture from the scleral exudates. The medical management was based on the antibiotic sensitivity. Surgical exploration of the suppurated area along with the healthy margins was done on all patients. Two patients required multiple explorations. All three patients resolved with a good visual and tectonic outcome. The literature review also suggests a good outcome with prolonged medical management though the preferred antibiotic has changed over the years.

CONCLUSION

Though the prevalence of a disease like Nocardia scleritis is low, the results suggest that specific diagnosis and appropriate management can lead to a good outcome.

Для цитирования: Sahu Srikant Kumar, Sharma Savitri, Das Sujata. Nocardia scleritis-clinical presentation and management: a report of three cases and review of literature.. Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12348-011-0043-9.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.