MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10067-009-1291-z

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rheumatology · 2009

Successful treatment of hypertrophic pachymeningitis in refractory Wegener's granulomatosis with rituximab.

Sharma Aman, Kumar Susheel, Wanchu Ajay, Lal Vivek, Singh Ramandeep, Gupta Vishali, Singh Surjit, Gupta Amod

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Central nervous involvement (CNS) is uncommon manifestation of Wegener's granulomatosis (WG). We are describing a patient with refractory WG with CNS involvement which responded to rituximab. This lady presented with nodular scleritis. Three months later, she developed headache, vision loss with complete opthalmoplegia, and relative afferent papillary defect. The brain MRI showed thickened dura along ant temporal region and enlargement of right cavernous sinus. C ANCA and PR 3 ELISA were positive. Non-contrast CT scan of orbit and paranasal sinuses showed soft tissue swelling of the right orbit along with mucosal thickening of right maxillary sinus. There were bilateral upper lobe nodules on HRCT of the chest. She responded to 3 days of methylprednisolone pulses and 1 g pulse cyclophosphamide but had multiple relapses while receiving high dose oral steroids and pulse cyclophosphamide. Then she was given four infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) at one-weekly interval. She had complete remission following rituximab. She relapsed after 6 months but again responded to repeat rituximab infusion.

Для цитирования: Sharma Aman, Kumar Susheel, Wanchu Ajay, Lal Vivek, Singh Ramandeep, Gupta Vishali, Singh Surjit, Gupta Amod. Successful treatment of hypertrophic pachymeningitis in refractory Wegener's granulomatosis with rituximab.. Clinical rheumatology. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-009-1291-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.