MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2333

Медицинская библиотека · Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025

Causal Association Between Oral Microbiota and Major Salivary Gland Cancer: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Ip Yanting, Chu Hoilun

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The two-sample Mendelian randomization approach was used to assess the potential causal relationships between 33 oral microbes and salivary gland cancer.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The data used in this study were obtained from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The instrumental variables included 33 known oral microbes, comprising a total of 39,117,105 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The outcome variable, major salivary gland cancer (MSGC), included 11,831,294 SNPs. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted via inverse-variance weighted (IVW) as the primary method. To ensure the robustness of the results, Cochran's Q test, the MR-Egger intercept test, leave-one-out analysis, and reverse MR analysis were employed.

RESULTS

The IVW analysis results indicated that the genus Alloprevotella (odds ratio [OR] = 1.267; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.037-1.549; p = 0.020) and the species Veillonella dispar (OR = 1.369; 95%CI = 1.081-1.734; p = 0.009) are statistically significant risk factors for the occurrence of MSGC.

CONCLUSION

The genus Alloprevotella and the species Veillonella dispar have a positive causal relationship with major salivary gland cancer.

Для цитирования: Ip Yanting, Chu Hoilun. Causal Association Between Oral Microbiota and Major Salivary Gland Cancer: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2025. DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2333.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.