Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2026
Implementing a direct support staff intervention in services for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour using the ItFits framework: From needs to action.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Embregts Petri J C M, Widdershoven Steffan, Lokman Suzanne, van Hoof Fleur, de Werdt Laurie, Frielink Noud
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Effective interventions often fail to achieve lasting impact due to implementation barriers. This study examined how Support Staff in the Spotlight - an intervention that enhances emotional intelligence and interactional awareness among support staff working with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour - can be embedded in daily routines within intellectual disability care.
METHOD: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation-design guided by the ItFits-framework, two Dutch care organisations completed a two-part-process: a needs assessment to identify barriers and facilitators, followed by communities of practice where key stakeholders co-created and refined tailored strategies. Data from focus-groups, structured logs, and interviews were analysed thematically.
RESULTS: The process helped to translate identified needs into concrete actions, such as adapting video-feedback procedures and embedding reflection in team routines. Organisational capacity, managerial continuity, and psychological safety were decisive for sustainability.
CONCLUSION: Leadership engagement and routinised reflection moments were crucial for sustaining staff-focused interventions in practice.
METHOD: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation-design guided by the ItFits-framework, two Dutch care organisations completed a two-part-process: a needs assessment to identify barriers and facilitators, followed by communities of practice where key stakeholders co-created and refined tailored strategies. Data from focus-groups, structured logs, and interviews were analysed thematically.
RESULTS: The process helped to translate identified needs into concrete actions, such as adapting video-feedback procedures and embedding reflection in team routines. Organisational capacity, managerial continuity, and psychological safety were decisive for sustainability.
CONCLUSION: Leadership engagement and routinised reflection moments were crucial for sustaining staff-focused interventions in practice.