MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20150003

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2015

Survival analysis in patients with metastatic spinal disease: the influence of surgery, histology, clinical and neurologic status.

Oliveira Matheus Fernandes de, Rotta Jose Marcus, Botelho Ricardo Vieira

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Spine is the most common site for skeletal metastasis in patients with malignancy. Vertebral involvement quantification, neurological status, general health status and primary tumor histology are factors to set surgical planning and therapeutic targets. We evaluated the impact of general clinical and neurological status, histologic type and surgery in survival.

METHOD: The study sample consisted of consecutive patients admitted from July 2010 to January 2013 for treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty eight patients were evaluated. 23 were female and 45 were male. Main primary neoplasic sites were: breast, prostate, lung/pleura and linfoproliferative. Thirty three out of 68 received surgical treatment, 2 received percutaneous biopsy and 33 had nonsurgical treatment.

SURVIVAL: Log Rank curves revealed no statistical significant difference according to histological type, surgical approach and Frankel Score. Karnofsky Score was statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Histological type and clinical status were statistically associated with life expectancy in vertebral metastatic disease.

Для цитирования: Oliveira Matheus Fernandes de, Rotta Jose Marcus, Botelho Ricardo Vieira. Survival analysis in patients with metastatic spinal disease: the influence of surgery, histology, clinical and neurologic status.. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2015. DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20150003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.