Negative prognostic influence of micropapillary pattern in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
There is uncertainty as to which factors determine the aggressiveness of lung adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary pattern (MPP). The present study aimed to clarify the influence of a MPP on the malignant aggressiveness of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
We retrospectively examined 347 consecutive patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection. We defined MPP-positive as accounting for ≥5% of the entire tumour.
RESULTS
Forty-eight (14%) and 299 (86%) patients were MPP-positive and negative, respectively. Lymphatic (P = 0.003) and vessel (P = 0.029) invasion as well as lymph node metastasis (P = 0.002) were more frequent in the MPP-positive than negative group. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly lower in the MPP-positive than negative group (69.7 vs 89.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for DFS showed that MPP (P = 0.048), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.003) and vessel invasion (P = 0.002) were independent poor prognostic factors. In addition, higher proportions (<5%, 5-30% and ≥30%) of MPP were associated with a poorer prognosis (89.3, 76.0, and 48.1%, respectively; P < 0.001). The prognosis of patients with MPP-positive tumours and negative tumours harbouring lepidic and solid predominant growth patents did not differ (100 vs 96.8%, P = 0.564; 66.7 vs 62.5%, P = 0.791, respectively). On the other hand, the prognosis tended to be poorer for patients with papillary predominant MPP-positive tumours than for those with negative tumours (62.5 vs 82.5%, P = 0.075).
CONCLUSIONS
MPP has an effect on tumour malignancy and patients with tumours harbouring a higher ratio of MPP or papillary predominant subtypes have worse survival.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.