Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2011
Feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy without diverting stoma.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hor Thévy, Zalinski Stéphane, Lefevre Jérémie H, Shields Conor, Attal Emmanuel, Tiret Emmanuel, Parc Yann
Аннотация
AIM: Restorative proctocolectomy performed before the advent of laparoscopy had evolved to frequently omit a diverting stoma. Our aim was to assess the impact of a diverting stoma on postoperative outcomes following laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy.
METHOD: Data on all patients undergoing a laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy at our institution were prospectively collated in a database.
RESULTS: Between November 2004 and February 2010, 71 patients (38 females) underwent laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Indications included familial adenomatous polyposis (n=34), ulcerative colitis (n=35), indeterminate colitis (n=1) and Lynch syndrome (n=1). Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy was performed as a one-stage procedure in 49 patients, and after a sub-total colectomy in 22. Seven patients in each group underwent the formation of a diverting stoma. Nine patients required conversion to open surgery. Sixteen patients experienced at least one postoperative complication. The postoperative morbidity was 29% (n=4/14) and 21% (n=12/21) in patients with and without a stoma (p=0.8), and the rate of fistula was 21% and 5%, respectively (p=0.08). Seven percent of patients with a stoma and 16% without stoma had an intra-abdominal collection (p=0.7). Nine patients required reoperation. The reoperation rate was not influenced by the presence or absence of a diverting stoma.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy can be performed safely without a diverting stoma in selected patients.
METHOD: Data on all patients undergoing a laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy at our institution were prospectively collated in a database.
RESULTS: Between November 2004 and February 2010, 71 patients (38 females) underwent laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Indications included familial adenomatous polyposis (n=34), ulcerative colitis (n=35), indeterminate colitis (n=1) and Lynch syndrome (n=1). Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy was performed as a one-stage procedure in 49 patients, and after a sub-total colectomy in 22. Seven patients in each group underwent the formation of a diverting stoma. Nine patients required conversion to open surgery. Sixteen patients experienced at least one postoperative complication. The postoperative morbidity was 29% (n=4/14) and 21% (n=12/21) in patients with and without a stoma (p=0.8), and the rate of fistula was 21% and 5%, respectively (p=0.08). Seven percent of patients with a stoma and 16% without stoma had an intra-abdominal collection (p=0.7). Nine patients required reoperation. The reoperation rate was not influenced by the presence or absence of a diverting stoma.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy can be performed safely without a diverting stoma in selected patients.