International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
Effect of drug-coated balloon in patients with severe vertebral artery origin stenosis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Jichang, Jiang Changchun, Wang Haibo, Peng Rixuan, Wang Tao, Kuai Dong, Liang Guobiao, Wang Feng, Wang Shouchun, Xu Chenghua, Chen Wenhuo, Deng Jianping, Hu Xingyue, Wan Shu, Li Bing, Yin Bo, Du Yifeng, Cheng Guangsen, Wan Jieqing, Chen Xingyu, Wang Yabing, Jiao Liqun, DCB-VAOS Trial Investigators
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is a common cause of posterior circulation ischemic events, and endovascular treatment serves as an alternative treatment. However, conventional endovascular treatment methods are related to high risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether the drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce restenosis risk of VAOS.
METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis.
RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03910166).
METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis.
RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03910166).