Emergency radiology · 2026
Diagnostic yield of repeat CT pulmonary angiography after a negative examination in the emergency department.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gorelik Natalia, Fung Tiffany, Sacher Eliana, de Albuquerque Lorenna Mendonça, Najjar Joseph, Sadri Erfan, Grange Sylvain, A Correa José
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although repeat CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) after a negative index examination in the emergency department (ED) is common, its diagnostic utility remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the incidence and diagnostic yield of repeat CTPA after a negative index examination in the ED.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults undergoing CTPA across three EDs at our center from 2016 to 2017. CTPA results were classified as positive, negative, or other (equivocal or negative with reported limitations) based on radiology reports. Patients with a negative index CTPA were followed for two years to identify repeat examinations. Diagnostic yield of repeat CTPA at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years was compared with that of the index examination using a likelihood ratio test for nested proportions.
RESULTS: Among 3,112 patients (median age, 60.1 years; 59.1% women), 331 (10.6%) had a positive index CTPA. Of 2,412 patients with a negative index examination, 297 (12.3%) underwent repeat CTPA within 2 years, including 202 (8.4%) performed in our ED. The diagnostic yield of repeat CTPA performed in our ED was lower than that of the index examination: 3.8% (1/26; p = 0.20) at 1 month, 6.0% (9/150; p = 0.051) at 1 year, and 6.4% (13/202; p = 0.04) at 2 years.
CONCLUSION: Repeat CTPA after a negative examination demonstrated a lower diagnostic yield than initial imaging, highlighting an opportunity for more selective use of repeat CTPA guided by clinical pretest probability.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults undergoing CTPA across three EDs at our center from 2016 to 2017. CTPA results were classified as positive, negative, or other (equivocal or negative with reported limitations) based on radiology reports. Patients with a negative index CTPA were followed for two years to identify repeat examinations. Diagnostic yield of repeat CTPA at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years was compared with that of the index examination using a likelihood ratio test for nested proportions.
RESULTS: Among 3,112 patients (median age, 60.1 years; 59.1% women), 331 (10.6%) had a positive index CTPA. Of 2,412 patients with a negative index examination, 297 (12.3%) underwent repeat CTPA within 2 years, including 202 (8.4%) performed in our ED. The diagnostic yield of repeat CTPA performed in our ED was lower than that of the index examination: 3.8% (1/26; p = 0.20) at 1 month, 6.0% (9/150; p = 0.051) at 1 year, and 6.4% (13/202; p = 0.04) at 2 years.
CONCLUSION: Repeat CTPA after a negative examination demonstrated a lower diagnostic yield than initial imaging, highlighting an opportunity for more selective use of repeat CTPA guided by clinical pretest probability.