MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.026

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2014

Accuracy, safety, and tolerability of tissue collection by Cytosponge vs endoscopy for evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Katzka David A, Geno Debra M, Ravi Anupama, Smyrk Thomas C, Lao-Sirieix Pierre, Miremadi Ahmed, Debiram Irene, O'Donovan Maria, Kita Hirohito, Kephart Gail M, Kryzer Lori A, Camilleri Michael, Alexander Jeffrey A, Fitzgerald Rebecca C

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) requires repeated endoscopic collection of mucosal samples to assess disease activity and response to therapy. An easier and less expensive means of monitoring of EoE is required. We compared the accuracy, safety, and tolerability of sample collection via Cytosponge (an ingestible gelatin capsule comprising compressed mesh attached to a string) with those of endoscopy for assessment of EoE.

METHODS

Esophageal tissues were collected from 20 patients with EoE (all with dysphagia, 15 with stricture, 13 with active EoE) via Cytosponge and then by endoscopy. Number of eosinophils/high-power field and levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin were determined; hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed. We compared the adequacy, diagnostic accuracy, safety, and patient preference for sample collection via Cytosponge vs endoscopy procedures.

RESULTS

All 20 samples collected by Cytosponge were adequate for analysis. By using a cutoff value of 15 eosinophils/high power field, analysis of samples collected by Cytosponge identified 11 of the 13 individuals with active EoE (83%); additional features such as abscesses were also identified. Numbers of eosinophils in samples collected by Cytosponge correlated with those in samples collected by endoscopy (r = 0.50, P = .025). Analysis of tissues collected by Cytosponge identified 4 of the 7 patients without active EoE (57% specificity), as well as 3 cases of active EoE not identified by analysis of endoscopy samples. Including information on level of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin did not increase the accuracy of diagnosis. No complications occurred during the Cytosponge procedure, which was preferred by all patients, compared with endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a feasibility study, the Cytosponge is a safe and well-tolerated method for collecting near mucosal specimens. Analysis of numbers of eosinophils/high-power field identified patients with active EoE with 83% sensitivity. Larger studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of this method of esophageal tissue collection. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01585103.

Для цитирования: Katzka David A, Geno Debra M, Ravi Anupama, Smyrk Thomas C, Lao-Sirieix Pierre, Miremadi Ahmed, Debiram Irene, O'Donovan Maria, Kita Hirohito, Kephart Gail M, Kryzer Lori A, Camilleri Michael, Alexander Jeffrey A, Fitzgerald Rebecca C. Accuracy, safety, and tolerability of tissue collection by Cytosponge vs endoscopy for evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis.. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.