International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022
Cost-effectiveness of miglustat versus symptomatic therapy of Niemann-Pick disease type C.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gutić Medo, Milosavljević Miloš N, Janković Slobodan M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with early infantile (< 2 years), late infantile (2-6 years), juvenile (7-15 years) and adolescent (> 15 years) onset. The mainstay of therapy for NP-C patients with neurological symptoms is miglustat, a drug that may modify the course of the disease.
AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of miglustat in comparison to symptomatic therapy in patients with NP-C in the socio-economic settings of the Republic of Serbia, an upper-middle-income European economy.
METHOD: The perspective of the Serbian Republic Health Insurance Fund was chosen for this study, and the time horizon was eighty years. The main outcomes of the study were quality-adjusted life years gained with miglustat and comparator, and direct costs of treatment. The study was conducted through the generation and simulation of the Discrete-Event Simulation model. The model results were obtained after Monte Carlo microsimulation of a sample with 1000 virtual patients.
RESULTS: Treatment with miglustat was not cost-effective when compared with symptomatic therapy and was associated with negative values of net monetary benefit regardless of the onset of neurological manifestations (- 110,447,627.00 ± 701,614.00 RSD, - 343,871,695.00 ± 2,577,441.00 RSD, - 1,397,908,502.00 ± 23,084,235.00 RSD and - 2,953,680,879.00 ± 33,297,412.00 RSD) for early infantile, late infantile, juvenile and adolescent cohorts, respectively).
CONCLUSION: When traditional pharmacoeconomic evaluation is employed, miglustat is not a cost-effective option in comparison to symptomatic therapy for the treatment of NP-C. However, given the proven efficacy of miglustat, there is a need to find ways to make this drug available to all patients with NP-C.
AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of miglustat in comparison to symptomatic therapy in patients with NP-C in the socio-economic settings of the Republic of Serbia, an upper-middle-income European economy.
METHOD: The perspective of the Serbian Republic Health Insurance Fund was chosen for this study, and the time horizon was eighty years. The main outcomes of the study were quality-adjusted life years gained with miglustat and comparator, and direct costs of treatment. The study was conducted through the generation and simulation of the Discrete-Event Simulation model. The model results were obtained after Monte Carlo microsimulation of a sample with 1000 virtual patients.
RESULTS: Treatment with miglustat was not cost-effective when compared with symptomatic therapy and was associated with negative values of net monetary benefit regardless of the onset of neurological manifestations (- 110,447,627.00 ± 701,614.00 RSD, - 343,871,695.00 ± 2,577,441.00 RSD, - 1,397,908,502.00 ± 23,084,235.00 RSD and - 2,953,680,879.00 ± 33,297,412.00 RSD) for early infantile, late infantile, juvenile and adolescent cohorts, respectively).
CONCLUSION: When traditional pharmacoeconomic evaluation is employed, miglustat is not a cost-effective option in comparison to symptomatic therapy for the treatment of NP-C. However, given the proven efficacy of miglustat, there is a need to find ways to make this drug available to all patients with NP-C.