MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00559-6

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2001

The indication of local excision for T2 rectal carcinomas.

Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Matsuoka H, Abe N, Watanabe T, Nagawa H, Muto T

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Several researchers reported that local excision with or without postoperative chemo-radiation therapy is an alternative approach for sphincter preservation in patients with locally invasive rectal carcinoma. However, indications and long-term results have not yet been determined.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with T2 colorectal carcinomas underwent bowel resection with regional lymph node dissection. The associations between lymph node metastasis (LNM) and clinicopathologic factors were examined with special reference to the presence or absence of moderate to severe degree of focal dedifferentiation or mucinous component at the invasive margin (unfavorable histology).

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both sex and unfavorable histology were significantly associated with LNM (P = 0.0102, 0.0226, respectively). However, the associations between LNM and lymphatic invasion or tumor location were not statistically significant (P = 0.0947, 0.1738).

CONCLUSIONS

When locally resected T2 rectal carcinoma specimens have unfavorable histology at the invasive margin, additional bowel resection with lymph node dissection should be recommended.

Для цитирования: Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Matsuoka H, Abe N, Watanabe T, Nagawa H, Muto T. The indication of local excision for T2 rectal carcinomas.. American journal of surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00559-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.