Journal of surgical oncology · 2000
Evaluation of anal function after surgery for rectal cancer.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Matteo G, Mascagni D, Zeri K P, Torretta A, Di Matteo F M, Maturo A, Peparini N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sphincter-saving surgical procedures for rectal cancer have been legitimized if executed respecting the criteria of oncological radicalness. Our objective was to evaluate anal sphincteric continence after rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: A detailed questionnaire regarding continence was administered to 3 groups of patients. Group 1 was composed of 9 patients treated with a higher (>4 cm), stapled colorectal anastomosis; the 9 group 2 patients were treated with a low (< or =4 cm), stapled colorectal anastomosis; the 9 group 3 patients underwent coloanal anastomosis.
RESULTS: The results were evaluated about 3 years after surgery. Continence was excellent in group 1 and very good in group 2. However, in group 3, we observed diminished gas/feces discrimination, reduced ability to postpone evacuation, and increased soiling and perianal rash.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincteric continence was better after surgery with a high or low colorectal anastomosis than after coloanal anastomosis.
METHODS: A detailed questionnaire regarding continence was administered to 3 groups of patients. Group 1 was composed of 9 patients treated with a higher (>4 cm), stapled colorectal anastomosis; the 9 group 2 patients were treated with a low (< or =4 cm), stapled colorectal anastomosis; the 9 group 3 patients underwent coloanal anastomosis.
RESULTS: The results were evaluated about 3 years after surgery. Continence was excellent in group 1 and very good in group 2. However, in group 3, we observed diminished gas/feces discrimination, reduced ability to postpone evacuation, and increased soiling and perianal rash.
CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincteric continence was better after surgery with a high or low colorectal anastomosis than after coloanal anastomosis.