Frontiers in oncology · 2026
A real-world 10-year follow-up analysis of survival and safety of CD20-targeted therapy in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Hengming, Huang Xufei, Zhu Yirong, Zheng Zhihong, Zhan Rong, Wang Shaoyuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term survival and safety outcomes of CD20-targeted chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) in a real-world single-center cohort from China.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 128 patients with WM who received CD20-based regimens at a single center from 2014 to 2024. Baseline characteristics, treatment efficacy, survival outcomes (OS and PFS) and safety profiles were compared among the four treatment groups.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in age, disease burden, and bone marrow infiltration. Patients in the R-CHOP group had higher IgM levels and bone marrow infiltration rates. The FCR group achieved the longest OS (75.86 ± 22.05 months, P < 0.01). The RTX group showed the poorest outcomes, with a mortality rate of 75% within 12 months after relapse. ORR and consolidation therapy rates were similar across groups. The FCR group had the highest rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (60%), mainly leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. The R-CHOP group had a higher infection risk, while RTX was the safest.
CONCLUSION: In this 10-year single-center real-world cohort from China, CD20-targeted chemoimmunotherapy achieved durable disease control with acceptable long-term safety in patients with WM. Differences in efficacy and toxicity profiles among FCR, BR, R-CHOP, and rituximab monotherapy support an individualized treatment approach that takes into account patient age, comorbidities, and tolerance. Because standardized quality-of-life instruments were not used in this retrospective study, our findings should be interpreted as reflecting survival and treatment-related toxicity rather than validated health-related quality of life.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 128 patients with WM who received CD20-based regimens at a single center from 2014 to 2024. Baseline characteristics, treatment efficacy, survival outcomes (OS and PFS) and safety profiles were compared among the four treatment groups.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in age, disease burden, and bone marrow infiltration. Patients in the R-CHOP group had higher IgM levels and bone marrow infiltration rates. The FCR group achieved the longest OS (75.86 ± 22.05 months, P < 0.01). The RTX group showed the poorest outcomes, with a mortality rate of 75% within 12 months after relapse. ORR and consolidation therapy rates were similar across groups. The FCR group had the highest rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (60%), mainly leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. The R-CHOP group had a higher infection risk, while RTX was the safest.
CONCLUSION: In this 10-year single-center real-world cohort from China, CD20-targeted chemoimmunotherapy achieved durable disease control with acceptable long-term safety in patients with WM. Differences in efficacy and toxicity profiles among FCR, BR, R-CHOP, and rituximab monotherapy support an individualized treatment approach that takes into account patient age, comorbidities, and tolerance. Because standardized quality-of-life instruments were not used in this retrospective study, our findings should be interpreted as reflecting survival and treatment-related toxicity rather than validated health-related quality of life.