BMC family practice · 2016
Impact of hyperkalaemia definition on incidence assessment: implications for epidemiological research based on a large cohort study in newly diagnosed heart failure patients in primary care.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martín-Pérez Mar, Ruigómez Ana, Michel Alexander, García Rodríguez Luis A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Various definitions of hyperkalaemia have been used in clinical research, and data from routine clinical practice on its incidence are sparse. We aimed to establish the incidence of hyperkalaemia in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure in the UK general population using different definitions for the condition.
METHODS: We conducted a large retrospective cohort study using data from The Health Improvement Network primary care database. Patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (N = 19,194) were identified and followed until the first occurrence of hyperkalaemia. Different serum potassium (K(+)) thresholds were evaluated as possible definitions for hyperkalaemia, and incidence rates (IRs) calculated using a final operational definition both overall and among patient sub-groups.
RESULTS: IRs of hyperkalaemia ranged from 0.92-7.93 per 100 person-years according to the definition. Based on considerable differences in the serum K(+) normal range used between practices, 2176 (11.3 %) individuals were identified with a record of hyperkalaemia using our operational definition of a proportional increase of ≥10 % above the upper bound of the normal range: IR 2.90 per 100 person-years (95 % CI 2.78-3.02) over a mean follow-up of 3.91 years. Incidence rates were higher in older patients, and in those with diabetes or renal impairment.
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperkalaemia is a common finding in heart failure patients in primary care, but its incidence can vary nearly ten-fold depending on its definition. Since assessment of hyperkalaemia risk is essential for therapeutic decision making in heart failure patients, this finding warrants consideration in future epidemiological studies.
METHODS: We conducted a large retrospective cohort study using data from The Health Improvement Network primary care database. Patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (N = 19,194) were identified and followed until the first occurrence of hyperkalaemia. Different serum potassium (K(+)) thresholds were evaluated as possible definitions for hyperkalaemia, and incidence rates (IRs) calculated using a final operational definition both overall and among patient sub-groups.
RESULTS: IRs of hyperkalaemia ranged from 0.92-7.93 per 100 person-years according to the definition. Based on considerable differences in the serum K(+) normal range used between practices, 2176 (11.3 %) individuals were identified with a record of hyperkalaemia using our operational definition of a proportional increase of ≥10 % above the upper bound of the normal range: IR 2.90 per 100 person-years (95 % CI 2.78-3.02) over a mean follow-up of 3.91 years. Incidence rates were higher in older patients, and in those with diabetes or renal impairment.
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperkalaemia is a common finding in heart failure patients in primary care, but its incidence can vary nearly ten-fold depending on its definition. Since assessment of hyperkalaemia risk is essential for therapeutic decision making in heart failure patients, this finding warrants consideration in future epidemiological studies.