Revista de neurologia · 1998
[Giant fusiform aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery. Surgical treatment with multiple clipping: a case report].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chillón D, Meneses F, Molina A, García de Sola R
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Giant cerebral aneurysms (GCA) are defined by sizes above 2.5 cm. GCA clinically appear by the mass effect exerted on adjacent structures, and in other cases, by embolismal action of the mural thrombo or as a post rupture subarachnoid hemorrhage. THERAPEUTICAL OPTIONS INCLUDE: inducting mural thrombosis, inserting an intraneurysmatic balloon, setting a bypass and surgical clipping. The major characteristics of giant fusiform aneurysm (GFA), the lack of neck and the inclusion of main vessels, give surgical treatment a great complexity.
CLINICAL CASE: 25 year old woman diagnosed of GFA of the middle cerebral artery, treated with direct surgical access with clipping and reconstruction of the vascular wall with fenestrated clips arranged in tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of an accessible neck for clipping and exclusion of giant and fusiform intracranial aneurysms, forced practising bypass as a compulsory surgical alternative. Multiple clipping was a viable choice because of its simplicity and less surgical risk. This technique is not applicable to giant serpentine aneurysms as it is only feasible in cases of fusiform aneurysms with no intraluminal thrombosis. A satisfactory evolution of this case, keeping asintomatic after 18 months of the intervention guarantees its application in young patients with giant thrombosed aneurysms of low clinical repercussion.
CLINICAL CASE: 25 year old woman diagnosed of GFA of the middle cerebral artery, treated with direct surgical access with clipping and reconstruction of the vascular wall with fenestrated clips arranged in tandem.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of an accessible neck for clipping and exclusion of giant and fusiform intracranial aneurysms, forced practising bypass as a compulsory surgical alternative. Multiple clipping was a viable choice because of its simplicity and less surgical risk. This technique is not applicable to giant serpentine aneurysms as it is only feasible in cases of fusiform aneurysms with no intraluminal thrombosis. A satisfactory evolution of this case, keeping asintomatic after 18 months of the intervention guarantees its application in young patients with giant thrombosed aneurysms of low clinical repercussion.