MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10459-007-9087-x

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2007

Impact of preadmission variables on USMLE step 1 and step 2 performance.

Kleshinski James, Khuder Sadik A, Shapiro Joseph I, Gold Jeffrey P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To examine the predictive ability of preadmission variables on United States Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE) step 1 and step 2 performance, incorporating the use of a neural network model.

METHOD: Preadmission data were collected on matriculants from 1998 to 2004. Linear regression analysis was first used to identify predictors of performance on step 1 and step 2. A generalized regression neural network (GRNN) as well as a feed forward neural network (FFNN) was then developed in an effort to more accurately predict step 1 and step 2 scores from these preadmission data.

RESULTS

Statistically significant predictors for step 1 and step 2 included science grade point average (SGPA), the biologic science (BS) section of the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT), college selectivity, race, and age of the applicant. Neural networks were found to predict a significant portion of the variance, and the FFNN demonstrated some superiority over that obtained with linear regression models as well as the GRNN.

CONCLUSIONS

The results have implications that could impact the selection of applicants to medical school and the neural networks that we developed could be used in a prospective manner.

Для цитирования: Kleshinski James, Khuder Sadik A, Shapiro Joseph I, Gold Jeffrey P. Impact of preadmission variables on USMLE step 1 and step 2 performance.. Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9087-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.