Hepatology forum · 2024
Performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers in biopsy-proven liver disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Danis Nilay, Gunsar Fulya, Yilmaz Funda, Nart Deniz, Turan Ilker, Karasu Zeki, Ersoz Galip, Akarca Ulus Salih, Ozutemiz Omer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the concordance of Transient Elastography FibroScan® (FS) measurements, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores with each other and with liver biopsies in predicting histological fibrosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior.
CONCLUSION: Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior.
CONCLUSION: Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.