Frontiers in immunology · 2026
18F-FDG PET radiomic analysis to predict outcomes in metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amrane Karim, Le Meur Coline, Bourhis David, Berthou Christian, Pradier Olivier, Misery Laurent, Legoupil Delphine, Etienne Maxime, Fontaine Georges-Philippe, Leleu Cyril, Floch Romain, Salaun Pierre-Yves, Abgral Ronan, Bourbonne Vincent
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence is rising, and despite advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), many metastatic patients do not respond or develop resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT-based radiomic model (MEL-RAD) for predicting 1-year progression-free survival (1y-PFS) in metastatic CM patients treated with first-line ICI.
METHODS: We retrospectively included 154 metastatic CM patients from two centers who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT before ICI initiation. Patients were split into a development cohort (n=95) and an independent testing cohort (n=59). Radiomic features were extracted and harmonized to reduce inter-cohort variability. A two-step feature selection identified three key wavelet-transformed texture features used to build the MEL-RAD predictive model. The model's performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Survival analyses (progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) were performed with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: In the development cohort, MEL-RAD achieved an AUC of 0.74 (p<0.0001) for predicting 1y-PFS. Using a 55% probability threshold, sensitivity was 93.8%, specificity 31.9%, with positive and negative predictive values of 58.4% and 83.4%, respectively. Patients with MEL-RAD >55% had significantly worse PFS (HR = 2.73, p=0.0009) and OS (HR = 3.20, p=0.0003). These results were externally validated: in the testing cohort, MEL-RAD positivity remained significantly associated with poorer PFS (HR = 2.73, p=0.047), and showed non-significant for OS.
CONCLUSION: The MEL-RAD radiomic model based on pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT offers a non-invasive biomarker to stratify metastatic CM patients treated with immunotherapy.
METHODS: We retrospectively included 154 metastatic CM patients from two centers who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT before ICI initiation. Patients were split into a development cohort (n=95) and an independent testing cohort (n=59). Radiomic features were extracted and harmonized to reduce inter-cohort variability. A two-step feature selection identified three key wavelet-transformed texture features used to build the MEL-RAD predictive model. The model's performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Survival analyses (progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) were performed with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: In the development cohort, MEL-RAD achieved an AUC of 0.74 (p<0.0001) for predicting 1y-PFS. Using a 55% probability threshold, sensitivity was 93.8%, specificity 31.9%, with positive and negative predictive values of 58.4% and 83.4%, respectively. Patients with MEL-RAD >55% had significantly worse PFS (HR = 2.73, p=0.0009) and OS (HR = 3.20, p=0.0003). These results were externally validated: in the testing cohort, MEL-RAD positivity remained significantly associated with poorer PFS (HR = 2.73, p=0.047), and showed non-significant for OS.
CONCLUSION: The MEL-RAD radiomic model based on pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT offers a non-invasive biomarker to stratify metastatic CM patients treated with immunotherapy.