Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2023
Quantitative analysis of external carotid artery bypass donor vessels by recipient and approach.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cohen Michael A, Evins Alexander I, Pinheiro Leon, Nonaka Motonobu, Xia Jimmy J, Stieg Philip E, Bernardo Antonio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Utilization an in-situ pedicle of the external carotid artery (ECA) as an arterial donor can allow for the successful augmentation or replacement of flow to a large vascular territory. We propose a mathematical model for quantitatively analyzing and grading the suitability of donor and recipient bypass vessels based on a set of anatomical and surgical variables in order to predict which pair has the greatest possibility for success. Using this method, we analyze all of the potential donor-recipient pairs for each ECA donor vessel-including the superficial temporal (STA), middle meningeal (MMA), and occipital (OA) arteries.
METHODS: The ECA pedicles were dissected in frontotemporal, middle fossa, subtemporal, retrosigmoid, far lateral, suboccipital, supracerebellar, and occipital transtentorial approaches. For each approach, every potential donor-recipient pair was identified, and donor length and diameter were measured as well as depth of field, angle of exposure, ease of proximal control, maneuverability, and length and diameter of the recipient segment. Anastomotic pair scores were determined by adding the weighted donor and recipient.
RESULTS: The best overall anastomotic pairs were OA-vertebral artery (V3, 17.1) and STA-insular (M2, 16.3) and STA-sylvian (M3, 15.9) segments of the middle cerebral artery. Other strong anastomotic combinations were OA- telovelotonsillar (15) and OA- tonsilomedullary (14.9) segments of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, and MMA-lateral pontomesencephalic segment of the superior cerebellar artery (14.2).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel model for anastamotic pair scoring can serve as a useful clinical tool for selecting the optimal donor, recipient, and approach combination that can help facilitate a successful bypass.
METHODS: The ECA pedicles were dissected in frontotemporal, middle fossa, subtemporal, retrosigmoid, far lateral, suboccipital, supracerebellar, and occipital transtentorial approaches. For each approach, every potential donor-recipient pair was identified, and donor length and diameter were measured as well as depth of field, angle of exposure, ease of proximal control, maneuverability, and length and diameter of the recipient segment. Anastomotic pair scores were determined by adding the weighted donor and recipient.
RESULTS: The best overall anastomotic pairs were OA-vertebral artery (V3, 17.1) and STA-insular (M2, 16.3) and STA-sylvian (M3, 15.9) segments of the middle cerebral artery. Other strong anastomotic combinations were OA- telovelotonsillar (15) and OA- tonsilomedullary (14.9) segments of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, and MMA-lateral pontomesencephalic segment of the superior cerebellar artery (14.2).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel model for anastamotic pair scoring can serve as a useful clinical tool for selecting the optimal donor, recipient, and approach combination that can help facilitate a successful bypass.