MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2012

Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress.

Limoncin Erika, Tomassetti Marco, Gravina Giovanni Luca, Ciocca Giacomo, Carosa Eleonora, Di Sante Stefania, Gentile Vincenzo, Mirone Vincenzo, Montorsi Francesco, Lenzi Andrea, Jannini Emmanuele A

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19-21 vs 6, 95% CI 6-7, p <0.0001). Logistic regression adjusted and unadjusted by propensity score indicated that women in the premature ejaculation group had a 7.12 (95% CI 5.98-10.14, p <0.0001) to 9.83 (95% CI 7.94-12.15) greater probability of sexual distress than controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire fulfills psychometric requirements for measuring sexual distress related to partner sexual dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Limoncin Erika, Tomassetti Marco, Gravina Giovanni Luca, Ciocca Giacomo, Carosa Eleonora, Di Sante Stefania, Gentile Vincenzo, Mirone Vincenzo, Montorsi Francesco, Lenzi Andrea, Jannini Emmanuele A. Premature ejaculation results in female sexual distress: standardization and validation of a new diagnostic tool for sexual distress.. The Journal of urology. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.