m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Scientific reports · 2024

The error of estimated GFR in predialysis care.

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Escamilla-Cabrera Beatriz, Luis-Lima Sergio, Gallego-Valcarce Eduardo, Sánchez-Dorta Nuria Victoria, Negrín-Mena Natalia, Díaz-Martín Laura, Cruz-Perera Coriolano, Hernández-Valles Ana Monserrat, González-Rinne Federico, Rodríguez-Gamboa María José, Estupiñán-Torres Sara, Miquel-Rodríguez Rosa, Cobo-Caso María Ángeles, Delgado-Mallén Patricia, Fernández-Suárez Gema, González-Rinne Ana, Hernández-Barroso Grimanesa, González-Delgado Alejandra, Torres-Ramírez Armando, Jiménez-Sosa Alejandro, Ortiz Alberto, Gaspari Flavio, Hernández-Marrero Domingo, Porrini Esteban Luis

Аннотация

The error of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and its consequences in predialysis are unknown. In this prospective multicentre study, 315 predialysis patients underwent measured GFR (mGFR) by the clearance of iohexol and eGFR by 52 formulas. Agreement between eGFR and mGFR was evaluated by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), total deviation index (TDI) and coverage probability (CP). In a sub-analysis we assessed the impact of eGFR error on decision-making as (i) initiating dialysis, (ii) preparation for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and (iii) continuing clinical follow-up. For this sub-analysis, patients who started RRT due to clinical indications (uremia, fluid overload, etc.) were excluded. eGFR had scarce precision and accuracy in reflecting mGFR (average CCC 0.6, TDI 70% and cp 22%) both in creatinine- and cystatin-based formulas. Variations -larger than 10 ml/min- between mGFR and eGFR were frequent. The error of formulas would have suggested (a) premature preparation for RTT in 14% of stable patients evaluated by mGFR; (b) to continue clinical follow-up in 59% of subjects with indication for RTT preparation due to low GFRm and (c) to delay dialysis in all asymptomatic patients (n = 6) in whom RRT was indicated based on very low mGFR. The error of formulas in predialysis was frequent and large and may have consequences in clinical care.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты