Renal failure · 2023
The role of plasma volume and fluid overload in the tolerance to ultrafiltration and hypotension in hemodialysis patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramos-Gordillo Jesús Manolo, Pérez-Campuzano Carlos, Relles-Andrade Elizabeth, Peña-Rodríguez José Carlos
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Ultrafiltration (UF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients is accompanied by irregular falls in plasma volume (PV) and blood pressure (BP).
METHODS: We obtained in 321 patients (large cohort), body weight (BW), BP, samples of blood to determine hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht), Pre and Post HD. We estimated the % variation of the PV and its effect on the BP. In a small cohort of 38/321 patients, arterial blood was drawn Pre and Post HD and at 2, 48, and 72 h to determined Hb and Ht and % variation of the PV. Bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed, in the same times, to estimate: dry weight (DW), total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), Fluid overload (FO) and phase angle (PhA).
RESULTS: We divided our large cohort in two groups. The Hypotensive group with a fall equal or more than 20 mmHg (96/321,30%) and Normotensive group with a drop equal or less than 19 mmHg (225/321,70%). The UF was 2.73 ± 0.72 L in the Hypotensive group and 2.53 ± 0.85 L in the Normotensive group (p < 0.0001). The % PV was -11.7 ± 17.8 in the Hypotensive group and -8.53 ± 10.07 in the Normotensive group (p < 0.0001). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) correlated with the % change of the PV (r = -0.232; p < 0.0001). The FO was contrasted with the % of water removed by UF (r = -0.890; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The SBP drop was secondary to the fall in the PV after UF. The FO was irregular and modulates in part the fall in the SBP.
METHODS: We obtained in 321 patients (large cohort), body weight (BW), BP, samples of blood to determine hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht), Pre and Post HD. We estimated the % variation of the PV and its effect on the BP. In a small cohort of 38/321 patients, arterial blood was drawn Pre and Post HD and at 2, 48, and 72 h to determined Hb and Ht and % variation of the PV. Bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed, in the same times, to estimate: dry weight (DW), total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), Fluid overload (FO) and phase angle (PhA).
RESULTS: We divided our large cohort in two groups. The Hypotensive group with a fall equal or more than 20 mmHg (96/321,30%) and Normotensive group with a drop equal or less than 19 mmHg (225/321,70%). The UF was 2.73 ± 0.72 L in the Hypotensive group and 2.53 ± 0.85 L in the Normotensive group (p < 0.0001). The % PV was -11.7 ± 17.8 in the Hypotensive group and -8.53 ± 10.07 in the Normotensive group (p < 0.0001). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) correlated with the % change of the PV (r = -0.232; p < 0.0001). The FO was contrasted with the % of water removed by UF (r = -0.890; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The SBP drop was secondary to the fall in the PV after UF. The FO was irregular and modulates in part the fall in the SBP.