MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.014

Медицинская библиотека · Patient education and counseling · 2007

Evidence from a cohort of able bodied adults to support the need for driver training for motorized scooters before community participation.

Nitz Jennifer C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to utilize the implementation of a new competency test in order to define skills required to safely drive a motorized scooter. This test endeavours to reduce the number of driving and pedestrian related accidents, by determining an acceptable level of driver skill and awareness.

METHODS

Healthy subjects, who might at some time use a motorized scooter for mobility, were recruited from the local community. Each undertook a driver competency test including basic driving skills, traffic and multiple tasks. Ten subjects repeated the test three times to determine practice effect on proficiency.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of the 50 participating subjects (mean age 34 years) failed at least one test item. Basic skills of reversing, weave and zigzag, and all traffic and performing multiple simultaneous tasks produced failures.

CONCLUSION

Driving skills for motorized scooters need to be taught and learned with assessment for competency recommended before unrestricted community driving is allowed.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Basic driving skills including weaving, steering in reverse and traffic and multiple tasking need to be taught and tested for all new users of this equipment.

Для цитирования: Nitz Jennifer C. Evidence from a cohort of able bodied adults to support the need for driver training for motorized scooters before community participation.. Patient education and counseling. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.