MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.02.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of safety research · 2006

Gender differences in the Swedish driving-license test.

Wiberg Marie

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Male drivers between 18-24 years are involved in many more motor-vehicle accidents than female drivers in Sweden. Is there also a gender difference in test performance in the Swedish driving-license tests? Is it a real difference or do any of the items display differential item functioning (DIF) with respect to gender or educational background?

METHOD: Two random samples of test-takers' performance on the Swedish theory driving-license test were examined with descriptive and inference statistics.

RESULTS

Female test-takers performed better than male test-takers on the theory test, which is a real difference since no items displayed DIF with respect to gender. There was no gender difference in the practical test. The gender difference in the theory test could not be fully explained by differences in educational background.

CONCLUSIONS

Although everyone who passes the driving-license test has fulfilled the goals stated in the curriculum, it is possible that the gender differences in the theory test are consistent over time, and therefore might be one factor that explains why male drivers are over-represented in traffic accidents.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Gender differences appear persistent over time. Therefore, by improving male test takers' result on the test may lead to positive effects on the male test takers future driving career.

Для цитирования: Wiberg Marie. Gender differences in the Swedish driving-license test.. Journal of safety research. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.02.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.