Medicina clinica · 2022
Effectiveness and safety of the treatment of lysosomal deposit diseases: Analysis of 22 patients.
Клинический случайНаблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Canales-Siguero Dolores, García-Muñoz Carmen, Quijada Fraile Pilar, Morales Conejo Montserrat, Ferrari-Piquero José Miguel, Martín-Hernández Elena
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Identify the efficacy variables collected in the literature for therapies used in lysosomal storage diseases (LDS), evaluate the quality of this evidence, and know the effectiveness and safety of these treatments.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study that included patients with LDS treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or substrate reduction therapy (SRT). Published clinical trials (CT) and LDS treatment guidelines were reviewed to select efficacy variables. Data to measure them (and adverse effects) were obtained from the medical history.
RESULTS: No CTs have been found in which efficacy is evaluated with final variables, all have been surrogated. Twenty-two patients were included: eight with Gaucher disease, six with Niemann-PickC disease, two with Hunter disease, one with Morquio-A disease, and five with Pompe disease. Eight patients have responded to ERT and one to SRT with eliglustat. ERT has not been associated with adverse effects. Miglustat has produced tolerance problems, requiring a change in a patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness was variable according to the pathology. Regarding safety, manageable adverse reactions to SRT were associated with dosage adjustments.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study that included patients with LDS treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or substrate reduction therapy (SRT). Published clinical trials (CT) and LDS treatment guidelines were reviewed to select efficacy variables. Data to measure them (and adverse effects) were obtained from the medical history.
RESULTS: No CTs have been found in which efficacy is evaluated with final variables, all have been surrogated. Twenty-two patients were included: eight with Gaucher disease, six with Niemann-PickC disease, two with Hunter disease, one with Morquio-A disease, and five with Pompe disease. Eight patients have responded to ERT and one to SRT with eliglustat. ERT has not been associated with adverse effects. Miglustat has produced tolerance problems, requiring a change in a patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness was variable according to the pathology. Regarding safety, manageable adverse reactions to SRT were associated with dosage adjustments.