European journal of applied physiology · 2025
The additive effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and resistance training on muscle mass and strength.
СтатьяМетаанализОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Narvaez Gabriel, Apaflo Jehu, Wagler Amy, McAinch Andrew, Bajpeyi Sudip
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare strength and muscle mass development between conventional resistance training (RT) and a combined resistance training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (RT + NMES).
METHODS: Searches of EBSCO, GoogleScholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate were conducted for studies that met the inclusion criteria of being a randomized controlled trial comparing RT in isolation with NMES and RT being done simultaneously. Effect sizes were calculated as the standard mean difference (SMD) and meta-analyses were computed using random effects models. Thirteen studies were included in the analyses.
RESULTS: When comparing strength gain, there was a favorable effect towards superimposed training (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 73.05%) with similar results seen for muscle mass (SMD: 0.26; 95% CI 0.04-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 21.45%).
CONCLUSION: Use of NMES during RT results in greater gains in strength and muscle mass compared to RT performed in isolation. Incorporation of NMES into RT protocols may represent a more effective strategy to improve muscle strength and muscle mass. Future studies should explore whether use of NMES concurrently with RT may have additive effects on metabolic and/or cardiovascular health.
METHODS: Searches of EBSCO, GoogleScholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate were conducted for studies that met the inclusion criteria of being a randomized controlled trial comparing RT in isolation with NMES and RT being done simultaneously. Effect sizes were calculated as the standard mean difference (SMD) and meta-analyses were computed using random effects models. Thirteen studies were included in the analyses.
RESULTS: When comparing strength gain, there was a favorable effect towards superimposed training (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 73.05%) with similar results seen for muscle mass (SMD: 0.26; 95% CI 0.04-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 21.45%).
CONCLUSION: Use of NMES during RT results in greater gains in strength and muscle mass compared to RT performed in isolation. Incorporation of NMES into RT protocols may represent a more effective strategy to improve muscle strength and muscle mass. Future studies should explore whether use of NMES concurrently with RT may have additive effects on metabolic and/or cardiovascular health.