Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2026
Acute non-local effects on range of motion and drop jumping performance following static stretching of the knee extensors and knee flexors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Scardina Antonino, Nakamura Masatoshi, Rossi Carlo, Bellafiore Marianna, Bianco Antonino, Thomas Ewan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to evaluate the acute range of motion and jumping performance of a single leg drop jump following static stretching (SS) applied to muscles of the thigh (non-local effects).
METHODS: Ninety participants (23.1 ± 3.28 years; 65.7 ± 1.83 kg; 167 ± 9.46 cm) took part in a study involving a control session (CS) and four interventions: single stretching of knee extensor muscles (KE), knee flexor muscles (KF), and both muscle groups in reverse order (KE/KF and KF/KE groups). Measurements of passive hip flexion (PSLR) and extension (PHE), as well as a single leg drop jumping performance (SLDJ), were recorded for the right limb at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1), and 15 min post-intervention (T2). In all analyses, the significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: No significant variations were observed for the CS. Statistically significant increases for PSLR and PHE tests were observed. Post-hoc analysis between T0 and T1 revealed differences in PSLR following the KF (p < 0.001) and KE/KF groups (p = 0.006) and in PHE following the KF (p = 0.025) and KF/KE groups (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in SLDJ for any of the groups.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that acute non-local stretching despite increases local ROM does not directly impact muscle performance in adjacent body segments. Non-local static stretching may be applied in sports and rehabilitation settings, without impacting on subsequent performance or if local stretching cannot be applied.
METHODS: Ninety participants (23.1 ± 3.28 years; 65.7 ± 1.83 kg; 167 ± 9.46 cm) took part in a study involving a control session (CS) and four interventions: single stretching of knee extensor muscles (KE), knee flexor muscles (KF), and both muscle groups in reverse order (KE/KF and KF/KE groups). Measurements of passive hip flexion (PSLR) and extension (PHE), as well as a single leg drop jumping performance (SLDJ), were recorded for the right limb at baseline (T0), immediately post-intervention (T1), and 15 min post-intervention (T2). In all analyses, the significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: No significant variations were observed for the CS. Statistically significant increases for PSLR and PHE tests were observed. Post-hoc analysis between T0 and T1 revealed differences in PSLR following the KF (p < 0.001) and KE/KF groups (p = 0.006) and in PHE following the KF (p = 0.025) and KF/KE groups (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in SLDJ for any of the groups.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that acute non-local stretching despite increases local ROM does not directly impact muscle performance in adjacent body segments. Non-local static stretching may be applied in sports and rehabilitation settings, without impacting on subsequent performance or if local stretching cannot be applied.