Cirugia y cirujanos · 2025
Emergence agitation in open rhinoplasty operations neutrophil/lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratio as a predictive marker.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
İlyas Yasir, Beşïr Ahmet, Karademir Esra, Livaoğlu Murat
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between emergence agitation and pre-operative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) after rhinoplasty.
METHODS: Our study included 104 patients. All patients underwent surgery under standard general anesthesia. In the pre-operative period, receiver operating curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff values of NLR and PLR for the risk of emergence agitation and pre-operative anxiety. A correlation analysis was performed between NLR and PLR, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale, and the body image disturbance scale.
RESULTS: While the area under the curve (AUC) value of NLR for emergence agitation was not significant (p = 0.76), the cutoff value for PLR was 113.37 (AUC = 0.624, sensitivity = 80.65%, specificity = 45.21%, p = 0.046). Median PLR values were higher in patients with emergence agitation (p = 0.046). The AUC value for pre-operative anxiety was not significant. There was no correlation between NLR and PLR and the scales assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that PLR may be a predictive biomarker in evaluating the risk of pre-operative emergence agitation in patients scheduled for rhinoplasty.
METHODS: Our study included 104 patients. All patients underwent surgery under standard general anesthesia. In the pre-operative period, receiver operating curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff values of NLR and PLR for the risk of emergence agitation and pre-operative anxiety. A correlation analysis was performed between NLR and PLR, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scale, and the body image disturbance scale.
RESULTS: While the area under the curve (AUC) value of NLR for emergence agitation was not significant (p = 0.76), the cutoff value for PLR was 113.37 (AUC = 0.624, sensitivity = 80.65%, specificity = 45.21%, p = 0.046). Median PLR values were higher in patients with emergence agitation (p = 0.046). The AUC value for pre-operative anxiety was not significant. There was no correlation between NLR and PLR and the scales assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that PLR may be a predictive biomarker in evaluating the risk of pre-operative emergence agitation in patients scheduled for rhinoplasty.