MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/alr.23132

Медицинская библиотека · International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2023

Diagnosis, Prognosticators, and Management of Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement and Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations.

Roland Lauren T, Humphreys Ian M, Le Christopher H, Babik Jennifer M, Bailey Christopher E, Ediriwickrema Lilangi S, Fung Monica, Lieberman Joshua A, Magliocca Kelly R, Nam Hannah H, Teo Neville W, Thomas Penelope C, Winegar Blair A, Birkenbeuel Jack L, David Abel P, Goshtasbi Khodayar, Johnson Patricia G, Martin Elaine C, Nguyen Theodore V, Patel Neil N, Qureshi Hannan A, Tay Kaijun, Vasudev Milind, Abuzeid Waleed M, Hwang Peter H, Jafari Aria, Russell Matthew S, Turner Justin H, Wise Sarah K, Kuan Edward C

ОбзорСтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acute invasive fungal sinusitis (AIFS) is an aggressive disease that requires prompt diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment given its rapid progression. However, there is currently no consensus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management strategies for AIFS, with multiple modalities routinely employed. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on AIFS, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the management of AIFS.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through January 2022. Studies evaluating management for orbital, non-sinonasal head and neck, and intracranial manifestations of AIFS were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on management principles for AIFS were generated.

RESULTS

A review and evaluation of published literature was performed on 12 topics surrounding AIFS (signs and symptoms, laboratory and microbiology diagnostics, endoscopy, imaging, pathology, surgery, medical therapy, management of extrasinus extension, reversing immunosuppression, and outcomes and survival). The aggregate quality of evidence was varied across reviewed domains.

CONCLUSION

Based on the currently available evidence, judicious utilization of a combination of history and physical examination, laboratory and histopathologic techniques, and endoscopy provide the cornerstone for accurate diagnosis of AIFS. In addition, AIFS is optimally managed by a multidisciplinary team via a combination of surgery (including resection whenever possible), antifungal therapy, and correcting sources of immunosuppression. Higher quality (i.e., prospective) studies are needed to better define the roles of each modality and determine diagnosis and treatment algorithms.

Для цитирования: Roland Lauren T, Humphreys Ian M, Le Christopher H, Babik Jennifer M, Bailey Christopher E, Ediriwickrema Lilangi S, Fung Monica, Lieberman Joshua A, Magliocca Kelly R, Nam Hannah H, Teo Neville W, Thomas Penelope C, Winegar Blair A, Birkenbeuel Jack L, David Abel P, Goshtasbi Khodayar, Johnson Patricia G, Martin Elaine C, Nguyen Theodore V, Patel Neil N, Qureshi Hannan A, Tay Kaijun, Vasudev Milind, Abuzeid Waleed M, Hwang Peter H, Jafari Aria, Russell Matthew S, Turner Justin H, Wise Sarah K, Kuan Edward C. Diagnosis, Prognosticators, and Management of Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement and Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations.. International forum of allergy & rhinology. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/alr.23132.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.