World journal of surgery · 2016
Does Lymphadenectomy Improve Survival in Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma? A Population-Based Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nilubol Naris, Patel Dhaval, Kebebew Electron
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A recent study suggested a survival benefit in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) who had undergone lymphadenectomy. The objective of this study was to study the effect of lymphadenectomy on the survival rates of patients with ACC.
METHODS: Data from adult patients with histology-proven ACC from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 Registries (1973-2011) were analyzed to assess the impact of lymphadenectomy (≥4 lymph nodes removed) on disease-specific survival (DSS).
RESULTS: Of 1525 patients with ACC, 45% were male. 36, 20, and 44% of patients presented with localized, regional, and distant metastatic diseases, respectively. 8% of patients (n = 67/802) underwent lymphadenectomy. We observed a higher rate of lymphadenectomy performed in patients with regional disease [locally advanced tumors (stage T3 and T4) and/or lymph node metastasis] and distant metastasis than in those with localized tumors (12.4% and 12.0 vs. 5.1, respectively, p < 0.01) and in patients with primary tumor sizes >10 cm (12.4 vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.01). Lymph node metastasis was present in 12.8% (19.2% in locally advanced ACC). A lymphadenectomy was not associated with improved DSS on univariate analysis (p = 0.30), regardless of tumor size or staging. Independent prognostic factors included: ages ≥60 years (p < 0.01, HR 1.70), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.01, HR 1.7), distant metastasis (p < 0.01, HR 5.6), complete resection of tumor (p < 0.01, HR 0.47), and debulking surgery (p < 0.01, HR 0.49).
CONCLUSION: A lymphadenectomy is not commonly performed in patients with ACC in the U.S. Although we found no survival benefit in this cohort with a low rate of lymphadenectomy, a lymphadenectomy may be considered in patients with locally advanced tumors (T3 and T4) due to a higher rate of lymph node metastasis.
METHODS: Data from adult patients with histology-proven ACC from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 Registries (1973-2011) were analyzed to assess the impact of lymphadenectomy (≥4 lymph nodes removed) on disease-specific survival (DSS).
RESULTS: Of 1525 patients with ACC, 45% were male. 36, 20, and 44% of patients presented with localized, regional, and distant metastatic diseases, respectively. 8% of patients (n = 67/802) underwent lymphadenectomy. We observed a higher rate of lymphadenectomy performed in patients with regional disease [locally advanced tumors (stage T3 and T4) and/or lymph node metastasis] and distant metastasis than in those with localized tumors (12.4% and 12.0 vs. 5.1, respectively, p < 0.01) and in patients with primary tumor sizes >10 cm (12.4 vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.01). Lymph node metastasis was present in 12.8% (19.2% in locally advanced ACC). A lymphadenectomy was not associated with improved DSS on univariate analysis (p = 0.30), regardless of tumor size or staging. Independent prognostic factors included: ages ≥60 years (p < 0.01, HR 1.70), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.01, HR 1.7), distant metastasis (p < 0.01, HR 5.6), complete resection of tumor (p < 0.01, HR 0.47), and debulking surgery (p < 0.01, HR 0.49).
CONCLUSION: A lymphadenectomy is not commonly performed in patients with ACC in the U.S. Although we found no survival benefit in this cohort with a low rate of lymphadenectomy, a lymphadenectomy may be considered in patients with locally advanced tumors (T3 and T4) due to a higher rate of lymph node metastasis.