Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025
Cerebrospinal fluid markers link to synaptic plasticity responses and Alzheimer's disease genetic pathways.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kirsebom Bjørn-Eivind, Nilsson Johanna, Vromen Ellen, Arnesen Peter Mikael, Bjørnerud Atle, Brinkmalm Ann, Bråthen Geir, Grøntvedt Gøril Rolfseng, Jarholm Jonas, Nordengen Kaja, Pålhaugen Lene, Selnes Per, Siafarikas Nikias, Skogseth Ragnhild Eide, Tecelão Sandra, Waterloo Knut, You Panpan, Zetterberg Henrik, Aarsland Dag, Tijms Betty, Visser Pieter Jelle, Blennow Kaj, Fladby Tormod
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Synapse loss is linked to cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) synaptic biomarkers may clarify disease heterogeneity and disease mechanisms for progression beyond amyloid (Aβ) and tau pathologies, potentially revealing new drug targets.
METHODS: We used a mass-spectrometry panel of 17 synaptic biomarkers including neuronal pentraxins (NPTXs) linked to glutamatergic signaling, and 14-3-3 proteins linked to tau-pathology and synaptic plasticity. Synapse markers were evaluated in two independent cohorts: Dementia Disease Initiation (DDI) (n = 346) and Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n = 397), both with cognitive assessments up to 10 years. We used linear regression to compare synapse marker differences between CSF-determined Aβ + cognitively normal (CN) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) groups, with or without CSF tau pathology (Tau+/-), relative to CN Aβ-/Tau- controls; and associations between synapse markers and medial temporal lobe (MTL) MRI volumetrics in the DDI cohort and with verbal memory in both cohorts. A funneling procedure identified proteins related to Aβ/Tau pathology and memory impairment in both cohorts, which were used to evaluate relations to Aβ/Tau biological progression in the DDI cohort and memory decline in both cohorts. Finally, we explored genetic pathways associated with these synaptic proteins.
RESULTS: In both cohorts, most markers were elevated in Aβ+/Tau + cases compared to controls, particularly 14-3-3ζ/δ. Several proteins were reduced in Aβ+/Tau- cases, especially NPTX-2, while 14-3-3ζ/δ remained elevated. However, the increase in e.g. 14-3-3ζ/δ and reduction in e.g. NPTX2 were more pronounced in patients with MCI than CN cases regardless of tau-pathology, corresponding to verbal memory impairment and MTL atrophy. Elevated baseline 14-3-3ζ/δ and rab GDP Dissociation Inhibitor Alpha (GDI-1) associated with future progression from Aβ+/Tau- to Aβ+/Tau+. Significant associations (all p < 0.001) were found between 14-3-3 protein genes (YWHAZ, YWHAE) and pathways linked to AD, including the p38 MAPK, IGF, PIK3/AKT and between GDI1 and p38 MAPK upstream pathway (p < 0.05) all connected to synaptic plasticity. Correspondingly, a robust 14-3-3ζ/δ association with future memory decline was observed in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced markers for excitatory signaling in Aβ+/Tau- and increased synaptic plasticity markers in Aβ+/Tau + cases suggest differential but linked processes underlying disease progression and resilience in the groups.
METHODS: We used a mass-spectrometry panel of 17 synaptic biomarkers including neuronal pentraxins (NPTXs) linked to glutamatergic signaling, and 14-3-3 proteins linked to tau-pathology and synaptic plasticity. Synapse markers were evaluated in two independent cohorts: Dementia Disease Initiation (DDI) (n = 346) and Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n = 397), both with cognitive assessments up to 10 years. We used linear regression to compare synapse marker differences between CSF-determined Aβ + cognitively normal (CN) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) groups, with or without CSF tau pathology (Tau+/-), relative to CN Aβ-/Tau- controls; and associations between synapse markers and medial temporal lobe (MTL) MRI volumetrics in the DDI cohort and with verbal memory in both cohorts. A funneling procedure identified proteins related to Aβ/Tau pathology and memory impairment in both cohorts, which were used to evaluate relations to Aβ/Tau biological progression in the DDI cohort and memory decline in both cohorts. Finally, we explored genetic pathways associated with these synaptic proteins.
RESULTS: In both cohorts, most markers were elevated in Aβ+/Tau + cases compared to controls, particularly 14-3-3ζ/δ. Several proteins were reduced in Aβ+/Tau- cases, especially NPTX-2, while 14-3-3ζ/δ remained elevated. However, the increase in e.g. 14-3-3ζ/δ and reduction in e.g. NPTX2 were more pronounced in patients with MCI than CN cases regardless of tau-pathology, corresponding to verbal memory impairment and MTL atrophy. Elevated baseline 14-3-3ζ/δ and rab GDP Dissociation Inhibitor Alpha (GDI-1) associated with future progression from Aβ+/Tau- to Aβ+/Tau+. Significant associations (all p < 0.001) were found between 14-3-3 protein genes (YWHAZ, YWHAE) and pathways linked to AD, including the p38 MAPK, IGF, PIK3/AKT and between GDI1 and p38 MAPK upstream pathway (p < 0.05) all connected to synaptic plasticity. Correspondingly, a robust 14-3-3ζ/δ association with future memory decline was observed in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced markers for excitatory signaling in Aβ+/Tau- and increased synaptic plasticity markers in Aβ+/Tau + cases suggest differential but linked processes underlying disease progression and resilience in the groups.