Do patients receiving workers' compensation who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have worse outcomes than non-recipients? Retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: We compared preoperative and postoperative measures among workers' compensation board (WCB) recipients and non-recipients and determined the impact of WCB receipt on the 1- and 2-year outcomes of rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic repair between September 2011 and September 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on WCB status: WCB recipients and non-recipients. All patients returned for follow-up functional evaluations at 1 and 2 years after the operation. Four outcome measures were evaluated: visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), and range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

Seventy patients (38 males, 32 females) were evaluated, 20 of whom were WCB recipients. At 1 year after the operation, ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores as well as abduction ROM (Abd-ROM) had improved significantly in both groups. However, non-recipients showed significantly greater improvement than did WCB recipients in ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores and in forward flexion ROM and Abd-ROM ( p = 0.000, 0.009, 0.002, 0.046, and 0.020, respectively). However, at 2 years after the operation (after the end of WCB), there were no significant differences in any clinical outcome between WCB recipients and non-recipients ( p = 0.057, 0.106, 0.075, 0.724, and 0.787, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although workers' compensation recipients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had worse outcomes while receiving WCB benefits, the outcomes were similar after WCB benefits ended.