The Journal of arthroplasty · 2018
Certificate-of-Need State Laws and Total Knee Arthroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Browne James A, Cancienne Jourdan M, Casp Aaron J, Novicoff Wendy M, Werner Brian C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Many states in the United States have certificate-of-need (CON) programs designed to restrain health care costs and prevent overutilization of health care resources. The goal of this study was to characterize the associations between CON regulations and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing states with and without CON programs.
METHODS: Publicly available data were used to classify states in to CON or non-CON categories. The 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files from 2005 through 2014 were then used to compare primary TKA procedure volumes, charges, reimbursements, and distribution of procedures based on facility volumes between the groups. Adverse events such as infection and emergency room visits after TKA were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Although CON status was associated with lower per capita utilization of TKA, the annual incidence of TKA appears to have increased over time more rapidly in states with CON laws compared with non-CON states (overall increase of 5.6% vs 2.3%, P < .01). When normalized to the Medicare population, the incidence of TKA increased 2.0% in CON states, whereas it actually decreased 7.2% in states without CON regulations (P = .011). Average reimbursement (and thus Medicare spend) was 5% to 10% lower in non-CON states at all time points (P < .0001). In non-CON states, relatively more TKAs appear to be performed in lower volume hospitals. Examination of adverse events rates did not reveal any strong associations between any adverse outcome and CON status.
CONCLUSION: CON programs appear to have influenced the delivery of care for TKA. Although our data suggest that these laws are associated with lower per capita utilization of TKA and the use of higher-volume facilities, we were unable to detect any strong evidence that CON regulations have been associated with improved quality of care or have limited growth in the utilization of this procedure over time. Confounding population and geographic factors may influence these findings and further study is needed to determine whether or not these programs have served their purpose and should be retained.
METHODS: Publicly available data were used to classify states in to CON or non-CON categories. The 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files from 2005 through 2014 were then used to compare primary TKA procedure volumes, charges, reimbursements, and distribution of procedures based on facility volumes between the groups. Adverse events such as infection and emergency room visits after TKA were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Although CON status was associated with lower per capita utilization of TKA, the annual incidence of TKA appears to have increased over time more rapidly in states with CON laws compared with non-CON states (overall increase of 5.6% vs 2.3%, P < .01). When normalized to the Medicare population, the incidence of TKA increased 2.0% in CON states, whereas it actually decreased 7.2% in states without CON regulations (P = .011). Average reimbursement (and thus Medicare spend) was 5% to 10% lower in non-CON states at all time points (P < .0001). In non-CON states, relatively more TKAs appear to be performed in lower volume hospitals. Examination of adverse events rates did not reveal any strong associations between any adverse outcome and CON status.
CONCLUSION: CON programs appear to have influenced the delivery of care for TKA. Although our data suggest that these laws are associated with lower per capita utilization of TKA and the use of higher-volume facilities, we were unable to detect any strong evidence that CON regulations have been associated with improved quality of care or have limited growth in the utilization of this procedure over time. Confounding population and geographic factors may influence these findings and further study is needed to determine whether or not these programs have served their purpose and should be retained.