AIDS (London, England) · 2013
Lower artemether, dihydroartemisinin and lumefantrine concentrations during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lamorde Mohammed, Byakika-Kibwika Pauline, Mayito Jonathan, Nabukeera Lillian, Ryan Mairin, Hanpithakpong Warunee, Lefèvre Gilbert, Back David J, Khoo Saye H, Merry Concepta
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of artemether, dihydroartemisinin and lumefantrine during rifampicin intake and after stopping rifampicin.
STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, two-phase, longitudinal drug interaction study with patients serving as their own controls.
METHODS: We recruited HIV-1-seropositive Ugandan adults who were receiving rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment and who did not have malaria. Pharmacokinetic sampling after six doses of artemether-lumefantrine was performed during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment (phase 1) and repeated at least 3 weeks after stopping rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment (phase 2).
RESULTS: Six and five patients completed phases 1 and 2, respectively. Median age and weight were 30 years and 64 kg. Artemether and dihydroartemisinin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12h)) were significantly lower by 89% [geometric mean ratio (GMR) 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.11, 0.05-0.26] and 85% (0.15, 0.10-0.23), respectively, during rifampicin-based treatment when compared to AUC(0-12h) after stopping rifampicin intake. Similarly, artemether and dihydroartemisinin C(max) were 83% (0.17, 0.08-0.39) and 78% (0.22, 0.15-0.33) lower, respectively, during rifampicin treatment. For artemether, mean (±SD) C(12) was 0.5(±1.0) and 5.9(±2.5) ng/ml in phases 1 and 2, respectively. Corresponding values for dihydroartemisinin (DHA) were 0.3(±0.4) and 4.7(±2.0) ng/ml, respectively. Day 8 lumefantrine concentration was significantly lower by 84% (GMR 90% CI 0.16, 0.09-0.27), and AUC(Day3-Day25) was significantly lower by 68% (GMR 90% CI 0.32, 0.21-0.49) during rifampicin-based treatment when compared to exposure values after stopping rifampicin.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic parameters for artemether-lumefantrine were markedly lower during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment. Artemether-lumefantrine should not be co-administered with rifampicin.
STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, two-phase, longitudinal drug interaction study with patients serving as their own controls.
METHODS: We recruited HIV-1-seropositive Ugandan adults who were receiving rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment and who did not have malaria. Pharmacokinetic sampling after six doses of artemether-lumefantrine was performed during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment (phase 1) and repeated at least 3 weeks after stopping rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment (phase 2).
RESULTS: Six and five patients completed phases 1 and 2, respectively. Median age and weight were 30 years and 64 kg. Artemether and dihydroartemisinin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12h)) were significantly lower by 89% [geometric mean ratio (GMR) 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.11, 0.05-0.26] and 85% (0.15, 0.10-0.23), respectively, during rifampicin-based treatment when compared to AUC(0-12h) after stopping rifampicin intake. Similarly, artemether and dihydroartemisinin C(max) were 83% (0.17, 0.08-0.39) and 78% (0.22, 0.15-0.33) lower, respectively, during rifampicin treatment. For artemether, mean (±SD) C(12) was 0.5(±1.0) and 5.9(±2.5) ng/ml in phases 1 and 2, respectively. Corresponding values for dihydroartemisinin (DHA) were 0.3(±0.4) and 4.7(±2.0) ng/ml, respectively. Day 8 lumefantrine concentration was significantly lower by 84% (GMR 90% CI 0.16, 0.09-0.27), and AUC(Day3-Day25) was significantly lower by 68% (GMR 90% CI 0.32, 0.21-0.49) during rifampicin-based treatment when compared to exposure values after stopping rifampicin.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic parameters for artemether-lumefantrine were markedly lower during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment. Artemether-lumefantrine should not be co-administered with rifampicin.